Football supporters at Slottsplassen, Oslo, ahead of the France game
France was the pre-match favourite
Norway lost 4–1 to France in Boston on Friday evening. Norway were awarded a penalty, but failed to score.
Before the match, Norway had built momentum in the group stage with a 4–1 win over Iraq and a 3–2 win over Senegal. Regardless of the result against France, Norway had already secured a place in the Round of 32.
Norway head coach Ståle Solbakken nevertheless chose to field a weakened team against France. The decision provided both rest and reduced the risk of injuries for the team's top players ahead of the remaining matches in the tournament. With the exception of one player, the entire starting lineup from the match against Senegal was replaced, and several more substitutions were made during the game. Norway's World Cup squad consists of 26 players. Norway's top players remained on the bench throughout the match.
In the betting market, France were the tournament favourites with a 19% chance of winning the title, while Norway were ranked 10th with a 3.1% chance. After the defeat, Norway's odds fell to 2.6%.
Before kick-off on Friday, France were the clear favourites. The betting market gave France a 60% chance of winning, with a 20% chance of a draw and a 20% chance of a Norway victory.
Mixed reactions to Norway's strategy
Criticism of Norway head coach Ståle Solbakken began as soon as the team lineup was announced a couple of hours before kick-off. The criticism intensified after the match, as none of Norway's top players came onto the field.
Much of the criticism centred on the view that the decision was cowardly and unsporting. Some claimed that Norway's top players were afraid to face their French counterparts. Others argued that it was unfair to the spectators, especially Norwegian supporters who had travelled to the United States to watch the match. During the game, Norwegian supporters, and possibly French supporters as well, chanted, "We want Haaland."
On the other side of the debate, supporters argued that Norway is taking part in the tournament to go as far as possible. They pointed out that football is also about strategy, being forward-looking and making smart decisions.
Another aspect is the Norwegian sporting model, under which teams are generally not selected based on ability alone before children reach their teenage years. This is for two reasons: Norwegian team sports also have cultural and social objectives, and many talented players may be lost if they are not given enough time to develop.
Overall, most Norwegians see the decision to field a weakened team against France as both brave and smart: brave because the team has had to face the criticism, and smart because it increases Norway's chances of success in the tournament.
The Viking Army stood behind the team
Behind the team stood the massive Viking Army, both in the stands in Boston and back home in Norway. The FIFA World Cup has become a huge public celebration and has developed into one of the tournament's most recognizable supporter stories.
The Viking Army may not have been quite as enthusiastic during and immediately after the match as they usually are, but that does not diminish the joy in Norway over taking part in the FIFA World Cup and reaching the Round of 32.
Thousands of Norwegian supporters continue to row with invisible oars as they cheer on the national team. Read more about the unique phenomenon known as the "Viking Row" here.
SOURCES
Nettavisen
Ståle Solbakken sjokkerer FrankrikeNettavisen
Solbakken avslører Norge-plan: – Da hadde Ødegaard og Haaland spiltNettavisen
«Mini» med klar Haaland-beskjed: – Da blir Norge svekketESPN
Norway coach Stale Solbakken: Resting Haaland vs. France a 'no-brainer'beIN Sports
Resting Haaland and Odegaard a 'no-brainer' for Norway boss SolbakkenClutchPoints
World Cup news: Erling Haaland on bench for Norway-France clashPolymarket
Norway vs France match market and 2026 FIFA World Cup Winner
Content on Society and Politics is based on reliable sources and actual events, providing a news-oriented perspective intented for further debate. To access the article’s author and the related debate, membership on Hudd is required.